Todays Date
    24 April 2014
    tennis b&w

    Connors is all-time greatest tennis player, says top sports statistician

    Ahead of the Wimbledon Championships, and after inputting the results of more than 20,000 Grand Slam matches involving over 1,000 players into his highly sophisticated computer model, one of the UK’s leading sports statisticians believes he has the answer: it’s Jimmy Connors.

    Dr Ian McHale, Director of the Centre for Sports Business at Salford Business School, and Chair of the Royal Statistical Society’s sports section, has developed a mathematical method for comparing the performance of tennis’s most illustrious players, taking into account their varying prowess from the beginning to the end of their career and the standard of opposition faced.

    The study has identified the year of maximum ‘strength’ or quality for each tennis player, which can be objectively compared with players of any era since 1968, when professionals were first allowed to enter the four Grand Slams (Wimbledon, the French Open, US Open and Australian Open), until the present day.

    By analysing the overlapping Grand Slam competitive records of 1,163 players in 725,754 games and 20,640 matches, Dr McHale’s method suggests that eight-time Slam winner Jimmy Connors at his peak in 1976 was the greatest person ever to have played tennis. Second in the list was Bjorn Borg at the height of his powers in 1977, with 2005-vintage Roger Federer in third place.

    Explained Dr McHale: “Purely looking at the number of Grand Slams won, with 17 titles Roger Federer is widely seen as the greatest. Our study uses a statistical model to provide an objective answer to whether or not that’s the case.

    “The key to it all is not to assign a single number to an entire career, but to look at how good a player was at his peak. Many players have slumps, and some would say Federer has been in just such a slump since winning the Australian Open in 2010, with his Wimbledon victory against Murray last year his only Slam triumph since then.

    “Using our new statistical method, we can give very good, objective answers to questions such as who would be most likely to win in a head-to-head between Federer at his imperious best and Borg in the mid-70s, or Rafael Nadal in 2008 versus 1990’s Andre Agassi.”

    Dr McHale continued: “By looking at results from tennis Grand Slams for hundreds of players, you can start to build up a picture using the overlapping careers of the players and attempt to decide who was the best.

    “So, while Connors didn’t compete in a Grand Slam in the same year as Federer, you can compare the two by looking at how Connors performed in the years when he was playing against Ivan Lendl, who played against Becker, who played against Sampras who played against Agassi, who was still reaching Grand Slam finals when Federer won the first of his 17 titles. In this way we can link the records of these greats together and directly compare Connors to Federer.”

    By making overlapping career comparisons for 1,163 players, Dr McHale was able to objectively measure the ‘strength’ of each player over time. This analysis included the closeness of individual matches in addition to the match result, with an easy, straight sets win over a tough opponent scoring more highly than a tight five-setter against a lower-seeded player.

    The results could then be used to estimate how easy or difficult it was for a particular player to win a Grand Slam in a specific year by measuring how tough the opposition was to beat in relative terms in each tournament.

    In addition, Dr McHale used the model to judge players over a sustained ten-year period of success, and over a total career. Connors again tops the pile for both of these measures, with Bjorn Borg second in each case. Roger Federer is ranked third in the five-year table, with Andre Agassi in third place when judged over a whole career.

    “As Jimmy Connors is top of the table using all three methods, I think the results suggest that he is the greatest tennis player of all time,” concluded Dr McHale, “although Bjorn Borg runs him extremely close.”

    The statistical model also reveals ‘golden eras’ of tennis during the mid-1970s, late-1980s to early 1990s and late 2000s by giving the average objective player quality over the period 1968 to 2012.

    Pete Sampras’s surprising omission from the top 25 players when measured by peak strength, and relatively low rakings of 15th and 14th best respectively when measured over 10-year and lifetime strength, can perhaps be explained by the research revealing a marked dip in average player strength during the mid-1990s. Sampras’s 14 Grand Slams are still hugely impressive, but he achieved them when the depth of competition for titles had never been weaker.

     

    Table showing top 25 all-time greatest tennis players

     

     

    Ranking

     

    Player

     

    Max. annual strength

     

    year

     

     

     

    Player

     

    Max. avg. 10-year

     

     

    strength

     

    Player

     

    Max. lifetime

     

     

    strength

     

    1

     

    J. Connors

     

    64.5

     

    1976

     

     J. Connors

     

    40.59

     

    J. Connors

     

    5.34

     

    2

     

    B. Borg

     

    63.29

     

    1977

     

     B. Borg

     

    36.07

     

    B. Borg

     

    3.61

     

    3

     

    R. Federer

     

    49.56

     

    2005

     

     R. Federer

     

    29.56

     

    A. Agassi

     

    3.42

     

    4

     

    A. Agassi

     

    49.27

     

    1990

     

     R. Nadal

     

    27.59

     

    R. Federer

     

    3.36

     

    5

     

    N. Djokovic

     

    49.08

     

    2011

     

     I. Lendl

     

    27.54

     

    J. McEnroe

     

    3.26

     

    6

     

    R. Nadal

     

    45.9

     

    2008

     

     J. McEnroe

     

    25.54

     

    I. Lendl

     

    3.09

     

    7

     

    J. McEnroe

     

    45.89

     

    1983

     

     A. Agassi

     

    22.75

     

    R. Nadal

     

    2.76

     

    8

     

    R. Laver

     

    45.29

     

    1968

     

     R. Laver

     

    20.95

     

    B. Becker

     

    2.62

     

    9

     

    K. Rosewall

     

    40.37

     

    1970

     

     K. Rosewall

     

    18.98

     

    R. Laver

     

    2.1

     

    10

     

    I. Lendl

     

    36.82

     

    1986

     

     N. Djokovic

     

    18.47

     

    S. Edberg

     

    2

     

    11

     

    C. Barazzutti

     

    35.54

     

    1977

     

     S. Edberg

     

    18.31

     

    K. Rosewall

     

    1.91

     

    12

     

    S. Edberg

     

    31.45

     

    1991

     

     J. Newcombe

     

    16.39

     

    N. Djokovic

     

    1.85

     

    13

     

    J. Courier

     

    31.1

     

    1992

     

     M. Wilander

     

    15.82

     

    I. Nastase

     

    1.76

     

    14

     

    P. Bertolucci

     

    29.84

     

    1976

     

     I. Nastase

     

    15.67

     

    P. Sampras

     

    1.75

     

    15

     

    M. Mecir

     

    29.77

     

    1987

     

     P. Sampras

     

    15.31

     

    M. Wilander

     

    1.68

     

    16

     

    M. Wilander

     

    29.42

     

    1987

     

     B. Becker

     

    14.37

     

    J. Newcombe

     

    1.66

     

    17

     

    J. Newcombe

     

    27.81

     

    1971

     

     A. Ashe

     

    13.85

     

    G. Vilas

     

    1.49

     

    18

     

    A. Roche

     

    25.88

     

    1968

     

     A. Roche

     

    13.36

     

    R. Tanner

     

    1.46

     

    19

     

    C. Graebner

     

    25.82

     

    1968

     

     C. Barazzutti

     

    13.21

     

    J. Courier

     

    1.43

     

    20

     

    R. Emerson

     

    23.95

     

    1969

     

     J. Courier

     

    13.19

     

    S. Smith

     

    1.43

     

    21

     

    I. Nastase

     

    22.57

     

    1974

     

     T. Okker

     

    12.72

     

    T. Okker

     

    1.43

     

    22

     

    J. Kodes

     

    22.54

     

    1971

     

     P. Bertolucci

     

    12.43

     

    A. Ashe

     

    1.42

     

    23

     

    M. Santana

     

    22.44

     

    1968

     

     S. Smith

     

    12.34

     

    A. Roche

     

    1.4

     

    24

     

    A. Ashe

     

    21.99

     

    1968

     

     R. Tanner

     

    12.22

     

    C. Barazzutti

     

    1.39

     

    25

     

    J. Higueras

     

    21.73

     

    1984

     

     G. Vilas

     

    12.18

     

    L. Hewitt

     

    1.31

    POPULAR POSTS